BeeAre wrote:hence our implementation requiring division of authority. Delegation through caste.
Anywhere between 150-300 games I believe- assuming you don't have any XP boosters. Should make the system to make it similar to the fact that you should have about 300 posts?Mir@k wrote:The tribunal system works for league of legends because to belong in it you must be level 20, something that may not seem like much for some, but it does take a good deal of time and effort.
Sir Soulchild wrote:WE ARE NOT A GAMING SITE.
please clarify how tribunal would work?
BeeAre wrote:no, that literal thing can't work, as far as I know. An automated voting system.
But we could emulate it. There might be a chance for punishment to be discussed in the private, hidden gold forum, about specific users, with polls on them being banned or not, when the mods are divided, we might ask the gold members. It would be useful, I think. I appreciate this conceptualizing, Birdot. :)
Q.U. wrote:I presume the punishments of users discussed in the gold forum would then only consist of "social" cases. Discussion of whether or not to ban a spam bot, or some user who spams pornography, or some other more severe and obvious rule violations would merely impede the efficiency of the process. I think a good way would be to let the gold forum give their opinions in cases of users who are causing trouble or unrest, but aren't directly breaking any rules.
Thus giving a sign that the community does not want the user around. Whether or not the gold members and the like are actually the voice of the majority of the forum userbase is, or will be, debatable.
Blood Lord wrote:I feel like we're trying to deal with the government or something.
Users browsing this forum: Tuor, Yahoo [Bot] and 18 guests