Sentios wrote:
BeeAre wrote:
Now this irritates me just a little bit. This forum's stagnation comes from the users' being content? That's funny, because the active and current moderation and administration staff are not content at all with the forums' current state of being.
You misread my post clearly. The reason no one says 'this forum sucks we should change it' is because most people are content with it. That has nothing to do with the board being stagnant, which is caused by not having a way to draw in users.
Whoa whoa whoa, what? I am not sure I'm doing the misreading here. You're saying most people are content. I'm saying that a specific group of people, the people given authority, are not. The board is stagnant under our supervision, which means it is our prerogative if not our responsibility to come up with a way to keep the forum stable, which is hard when it is stagnating because of a decision we made and at the time considered necessary. It's still in effect, too, so we still think it's necessary.
Quote:
Quote:
Recognizing this challenge is a part of why we are attempting to use this system at all.
The system does nothing to bring new users to the board, no one will join a board just to rank up through it, this isn't an MMO it's a forum. They're separate issues which a lot of the advocates don't seem to be making the distinction between.
It all hinges on Dave's attention, all our hopes and dreams of improving this board, that's right. Forgive me for my optimism.
Quote:
Quote:
Do you think offering privilege and friendship in an upwardly mobile way is an insulating idea?
That's the packaging of the idea you're trying to sell not the idea you're trying to sell itself, nothing about the ranking system will inherently promote any more friendship. Sure you can say 'if they won't be nice they'll lose that distinction and whatever privileges come with it' but in order to give the ranks power over user's behavior you must give the different ranks privileges which is an inherent division in the user base. It can likely instigate the formation of cliques, but who knows we might get lucky and it won't this time.
Division in the user base happens naturally. You and I and everyone else already knows this, but check this out: kids' cereals in the 60s. Companies were afraid to sell sugar-filled cereals because parents might complain about giving children unhealthy amounts of sugar. What happened? Kids didn't like fucking cheerios and shit with no sugar, so they poured a shit ton on by themselves in an uncontrolled environment. So the parents and companies agreed: control the level of sugar in the cereal so the kid has much less incentive to pour on more sugar and get diabetes.
Does the idea at least sound a LITTLE less retarded to you given which way I'm angled towards?
Quote:
Quote:
How about convincing Dave to make this not Snafu's forums, but Shark Robot's forums, so he has a hub he actually fucking cares about, so we can actually have an influx of members, if his merchandising scales are increasing as reported by people who have actually gone to cons.
Probably a good way to get more members, but this has nothing to do with the ranking system.
A ranking system is a neat way for an influx of users via this integration concept to energize the community by way of an interesting system of involvement. It's not just another forum, it's a forum with toys! Shiny!
Quote:
Quote:
Saving grace; at least you do seem to actually care, brudski, otherwise you (and a few others) would've seriously gotten me as close to angry as I've gotten in years (because it's physically unhealthy for me to be angry).
I'm not a programmer: I am here to administrate issues through authority and delegation by way of taking advice from the userbase to improve the forums. I don't think that, even at my current level of administration, I have access to "Founder" level permissions that would allow me to upgrade the software. The links you've provided are helpful for Founders. For people who made their forums. I don't discount your contribution despite them looking a bit irrelevant, with a lot of the options referring to introducing Captchas, et cetra, which I am not sure I can do.
It's why I've been asking for ideas and help. Because we need to change. At this point, the likely best thing would be if you all literally emailed Dave using the Shark Robot site contact email with the subject title "PLEASE RESPOND TO BR".
I care but I'm not about to lie and say I think we can turn this into a popular forum by giving it a face lift and some tags. That doesn't give respect to the true difficulty of what it means to revitalize a forum.
I agree with you on this, which is why I need the entire forum's help to get Dave up off Shark Robot and do something about the forums that would benefit him and us both.
Quote:
Methods for preventing bots from registering will likely all be Founder level (modifying the registration forms or even the board's files directly), it's kind of an impossible we're asking of each other, that's why I also suggested just making janitors as that definitely is within your permissions.
That contingency has already been discussed and will be implemented if we can't ever get Dave to help us. So there's not even discussion on that at this point.
If we have to, we'll just fucking give veterans the ability to ban what they suspect are bots, but then we'd be kinda 1984ish because all of you would have to watch each other to make sure no one banned anyone else. It's not a very promising scenario, either, if you really break it down, given how some people here can be stupid.
_________________
Bleedcomics Staff Writer/Editor,

, and Keeper of the Jar Brain of Secret President.
RIP Ku Ku Ku \(-^.^-)/ U Wuz A REAL N***A!!!!!!!"We're quite aware of this. BR is no happy rainbow face man. He is simply our neighborhood best fucking poster." ~ WarbearPuff Most Epic.