top gear tony 666 wrote:What do you mean two? World at War was really good, it's just Modern warfare 2 that was bad.
top gear tony 666 wrote:Duke is more in the Half Life category of comparing games, also known as the "original category of games."
Blood Lord wrote:top gear tony 666 wrote:What do you mean two? World at War was really good, it's just Modern warfare 2 that was bad.
I disagree with you. I've had enough of the god damn WW2 themed shooters to last until the world ends.
NeoWarrior7 wrote:Just like MW2.
You quick scope them, or you knife them.
top gear tony 666 wrote:And No it was IW falt. They were one of the most lazy game developers I have ever known and I am so glad that they went bust. IW was the worst thing to happen to the gaming world since EA games. Sure Activision always crack there wip and kick half made games out the door but IW had almost 2 bloody years to make it better but all they made was not a sequel to Modern warfair but more of an expansion pack that you have to pay full wack for.
top gear tony 666 wrote:Actually i'd better get back on the topic of Duke Nukem before any mods start giving me funny looks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest