A Free And Independent Scotland.
Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:47 am
It's a crazy Contra-diction.
Last edited by Mr. Sefrol
on Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:25 am
Not really. Retro games are excluded from the "graphics are shite" critique because you have to accomodate your critique to the fact that by the time those games were released, technologic limitations forced the games to look like they did, in other words you lower your standards.
But today's games have little excuses for looking like tremendous amounts of crap. Indie games are another exception because most of them don't have enough funding to afford good graphics, but in some cases when you know the developers are bathing in money, you can justify bashing on their sucky art.
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:02 am
Even though this was supposed to be a crappy pun, I think I delved into something unrelatable since this could be more of an inside joke thing. My retro fanatic friend of mine is downright bizarre. He obsesses over the slightest imperfection, missing out on stuff like Minecraft and other low budget/indie titles, yet praise stuff from the golden ages. It also annoys me that he breaks his electronics just to fix them even better... He's never satisfied... It's quite exhausting sometimes.
But he did fix my Sega Genesis, so he's pretty handy...
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:10 am
How was that supposed to be a pun
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:16 am
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:26 am
you should have put it like that in the OP
the way you did it just looks like what people do when they capitalize words because they think it makes the word important
Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:04 pm
There are NES games that look great, and there are NES games that look like crap, it's the same in every generation.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.