This forum can be a scary place, 'cause we got lax rules: let's see your war face. Take a breath, and roll the dice, you might find out we're really nice.
Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:48 pm
She has the same plan for a few forum members.
Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:50 pm
Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:58 pm
Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:30 pm
Radaghast is obviously the Santa of Middle-Earth. He leaves Hobbits weed, Dwarves gold, Elves hair dye, Men wigs, and Gollum gets fake rings. : D
Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:33 pm
That'd explain how Middle-Earth became England.
Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:44 pm
Blood Lord wrote:That'd explain how Middle-Earth became England.
I think we're gonna need a confirmation on that from Grey and/or Doctress, but it sounds promising.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:36 am
The dungeon run they had in the goblin kingdom put strain on my eyes.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:48 am
Did you see it in 3D 48 fps?
Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:31 am
Couldn't. Fully booked.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:59 pm
Then I guess you saw it normal with 24 fps. I dunno if they made it clear where you are but here they had on the ticket 24fps or 48fps.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:00 pm
48 is amazing.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:10 pm
It really is. My friend was saying it was making him sick whenever they would pan over or something.
But he was also hiding in his hoodie smoking pot for the first thirty minutes of the movie.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:16 pm
Quick question to everyone that watched the movie. With 3D or without?
I'm thinking without.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:18 pm
It was fine without. I keep hearing the 3D looked like it was added after sooo.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:53 pm
I've always agreed with Roger Ebert's opinion that 3D is largely not worth it and is really just a more expensive gimmick. I prefer to watch my films in 2D.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:27 pm
Anyone see it in 48fps, that's what I'm most interested in and whether or not it was actually a good choice.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:12 pm
And... I ended up not seeing the movie. I expected to have back row seats available a week later, there weren't any.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:28 pm
Princess Stuff wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time. You don't care.
Yes, but I hadn't seen it yet. There could have been the possibility of a change of heart.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:56 pm
My dad saw it in 3D with the 48 fps and said it was amazing, like it felt as though you were sitting with the characters.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:15 pm
Whatis6times9 wrote:Anyone see it in 48fps, that's what I'm most interested in and whether or not it was actually a good choice.
And it was fucking amazing.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:19 pm
Tuor wrote:My dad saw it in 3D with the 48 fps and said it was amazing, like it felt as though you were sitting with the characters.
But I've heard that is also it's undoing because it ruins some of the smoke and mirrors.
Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:27 pm
I've heard that too, but he didn't mention that was the case for him.
Anyhow, my friends and I are going tomorrow to see it and I said we were gonna see it in 2D and he gave me money and said I HAD to see it in 3D, haha
Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:33 pm
watch lord of the rings in HD and you can see some of the ends of the orc's facial prosthetics
Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:25 pm
I just watched it because I watched the trilogy at the cinema.
But I wasn't going to pay for 3D anyway.
Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:51 pm
Hiryu wrote:And... I ended up not seeing the movie. I expected to have back row seats available a week later, there weren't any.
I wonder why you wanted the back row
souuuunds like you didn't even plan on watching the movie....
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.