BeeAre wrote:well RD i don't see any evidence supporting your claim about me either
You'd rather turn a blind eye than admit I have a point, huh?
BeeAre wrote:so I'll just ignore your being upset at me and ask you to answer my post again, since this discussion is a specific one unrelated to other discussions.
That's called a tangent.
BeeAre wrote:I don't think that it's right that you bring up another argument and use your personal distaste of whatever you think happened in another argument to not respond appropriately to this argument.
I don't think it's right that you ignore the premise of my accusation to push your own questions. I thought you were in favor of Social Justice
So answer my claims, or your refusal to accept the grounds of the discussion I will accept as forfeiture of those claims by default.
Don't make me laugh. I will laugh in your face if you try to make these ridiculous deals with me. Do you want
me to laugh in your face? Cuz I will, and I will feel no shame or sympathy.
BeeAre wrote:and hey, you have a choice here: if you don't answer mine at all, I won't claim any forfeiture on your part if, while you still have claims to defend, you would just answer either Q.U. or Valhallen instead of me.
I warned you.
I'll respond to one or the other if and when I'm ready, not because I'm afraid that you will claim some shallow, lukewarm victory over me.